Author(s)
V.Madhan marudhu Pandian , S. Abraham
- Manuscript ID: 120161
- Volume 2, Issue 3, Mar 2026
- Pages: 223–244
Subject Area: Biological Sciences
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18833492Abstract
The rapid advancement of neurotechnology has significantly enhanced our ability to record, interpret, and manipulate brain activity, leading to transformative applications in healthcare, communication, and human-computer interaction. However, these developments have also raised critical privacy concerns regarding the collection, storage, and use of brain data. Unlike other forms of personal data, brain data provides an intimate window into thoughts, emotions, and cognitive processes, making it highly sensitive and vulnerable to misuse, unauthorized access, and potential manipulation. This study explores the intersection of neurotechnology and brain data privacy, examining the ethical, legal, and societal implications of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), neuroimaging, and cognitive monitoring devices. The study used both primary and secondary data. Primary data has been collected from 200 respondents using convenient sampling with structured questionnaires. From figures it is found that 22.28% of the respondents between the age group 21–30 years have stated that potential for manipulation of control is the biggest concern regarding brain machine interfaces and 17.82% of the respondents pursuing under graduation have agreed that neurotechnology has the potential to revolutionise healthcare. In conclusion, the findings state that while neurotechnology offers promising advancements, it also poses unprecedented challenges that require immediate attention. A balanced approach—ensuring innovation while upholding mental privacy and ethical integrity—is essential. Policymakers, researchers, and industry leaders must collaborate to establish robust privacy frameworks, enhance public awareness, and promote responsible development of neurotechnology to safeguard individuals’ cognitive autonomy in the digital age